- Date:
- Category: Wage Violations
The Minneapolis Wage Theft Prevention Ordinance requires employers to pay all wages owed for work performed in the city on the regularly established payday, and it backs that with notice and recordkeeping obligations that go beyond state law. It took effect January 1, 2020 and is enforced by the Minneapolis Department of Civil Rights.
It covers anyone who performs at least 80 hours of work in a year inside the city. That number belongs to this ordinance and nothing else.
You can reach out to us by calling (844) FERRARO.
What the Ordinance Requires
The ordinance sits at Minneapolis Code of Ordinances, Title 2, Chapter 40, Article V, covering sections 40.500 through 40.650.
Section 40.530 is the core obligation. An employer must pay all wages owed to an employee by reason of employment, for work performed in the City of Minneapolis, on the regularly established payday identified in the notice required by section 40.540. The provision ties the payment duty to the notice duty, which is what gives the ordinance its shape. The employer commits in writing to a rate and a payday, and then has to meet what it committed to.
Section 40.540 sets the notice requirement. Together they give the city two things to enforce: the failure to pay, and the failure to have told you clearly what you would be paid and when.
Who Is Covered, and the 80-Hour Number
Coverage runs to any individual who performs at least 80 hours of work in a year within the geographic boundaries of Minneapolis, regardless of where the employer is located. Temporary and part-time employees are covered on the same terms.
This 80-hour figure is specific to the wage theft ordinance. It is not the coverage trigger for the Minneapolis minimum wage, which applies to any employee performing at least two hours of work in a calendar week inside the city. A worker with three Minneapolis hours in a week is owed the Minneapolis minimum wage for those hours even though they will never reach 80 hours in the city in a year. Treating the 80-hour figure as a general threshold for city protections is a material error and a common one.
Three coverage points are worth knowing. Employees are covered regardless of immigration status. Independent contractors are not covered, though whether someone genuinely is a contractor turns on the applicable classification tests rather than on paperwork. And an individual who attends a convention, conference, training, educational class or similar event in the city, but performs no other work in the city for the employer, is not covered on that basis.
The Pre-Hire Notice
The notice, sometimes called a written notice, wage notice or offer letter, is where the ordinance does most of its work.
| Requirement | Minnesota state law | Minneapolis ordinance |
| Written notice at start of employment | Required under Minn. Stat. § 181.032(d) | Required, and must include everything state law requires |
| Sick and safe time details | Not required in the state notice | Accrual rate or frontloaded amount, and the earliest date the employee may begin using it |
| Employee signature on the initial notice | Required | Required |
| Notice of later changes | Required in writing before the change takes effect | Required, and the employee must sign the notice of change, except that a signature is not required for a wage increase where the employee received advance notice of the amount of the increase and the date it would occur |
| Record of when the notice was given | Not specified | The employer must keep a record |
| Employees hired before the effective date | Information provided when a change occurs | Full notice required to all existing employees by the end of the first full payroll period in 2020 |
| Earnings statements | Required each pay period under § 181.032(b) | Must also show accrued sick and safe time available |
Source: City of Minneapolis, wage theft guidance and Minneapolis Code of Ordinances, Title 2, Chapter 40, Article V; Minn. Stat. § 181.032. Verified September 5, 2026.
Two differences from state law are worth pausing on, because they create evidence. The city requires the employer to keep a record of when the initial notice was provided, and it requires the employee to sign notices of change, with an exception for a wage increase where the employee was given advance notice of the amount and the date it would take effect. Where a dispute later turns on what rate you were promised or when a change took effect, those documents answer it.
The city allows the notice to reference an employer handbook or policy containing the required information rather than repeating all of it, and electronic signatures are acceptable.
What Goes on the Earnings Statement
The ordinance builds on the state earnings statement rules by adding sick and safe time information. Each pay period, a covered employee’s statement should show the accrued sick and safe time available, alongside everything Minn. Stat. § 181.032(b) already requires, which includes your rate or rates of pay and the basis on which you are paid, total hours worked unless you are exempt from chapter 177, gross pay, each deduction, net pay, the end of the pay period and the employer’s legal name, address and telephone number.
A statement missing the rate line or the hours line is worth noticing. Those two fields are what allow anyone, including you, to check whether the arithmetic was right.
The Retaliation Presumption
The ordinance goes further than state law on retaliation, and this is its most useful provision for a worker deciding whether to speak up.
Where an employer materially changes the terms of employment within 90 days of an employee exercising rights protected by the ordinance, retaliation is presumed. The employer may rebut that presumption, but must do so with clear and convincing evidence of a non-retaliatory purpose.
Two elements carry that. The 90-day window sets when the presumption attaches, and the clear and convincing standard is a demanding one that puts the burden on the employer rather than leaving the employee to prove motive. State law layers its own protection on top, at Minn. Stat. § 181.03, subd. 6, which sets a civil penalty running from $700 to $3,000 for each violation.
If your hours, schedule, duties or status changed after you raised a wage question, record the dates. The sequence is what the presumption runs on.
How to Report, and the Deadline
Reports go to the Labor Standards Enforcement Division of the Minneapolis Department of Civil Rights, which can be reached through 311 or at (612) 673-3000.
The department provides a Report of Violation form, which its rules allow to be submitted in person, online, by U.S. Mail or by email. Any employee or other person may report an alleged violation, and the department may investigate an anonymous report.
A reported violation must be filed within two years of the alleged violation, or within three years if the violation is alleged to be willful, meaning not due to mistake. Those windows run from the violation itself, so a long-running problem loses its oldest weeks while it goes unreported.
Where the Ordinance Sits Alongside State Law
The ordinance incorporates much of the state wage theft law and adds city-specific requirements on top. It does not replace the state route, and filing with the city does not close the others.
The Department of Labor and Industry accepts wage claims statewide, and Minn. Stat. § 177.27, subd. 8, subd. 8 lets a violation of sections 177.21 to 177.44 go straight to district court, and where it applies, the underpaying employer owes the full amount plus a matching sum in liquidated damages, while subdivision 10 takes the costs-and-fees question off the table by making them mandatory. A claim resting on the ordinance alone does not carry the § 177.27 liquidated damages measure unless the same facts independently establish a chapter 177 violation. The city process does not award attorney fees, which is the other practical difference.
Our page on unpaid wages in Minneapolis explains what a claim involves, and the firm’s Minneapolis employment law page covers the other areas we handle in the city.
Frequently Asked Questions
I work in Minneapolis only occasionally. Am I covered?
Coverage under this ordinance requires at least 80 hours of work in a year inside the city. The city states that covered employees who work only occasionally in the city may file complaints regarding earned but unpaid wages for hours worked within Minneapolis. Separately, the Minneapolis minimum wage applies at a much lower threshold of two hours in a calendar week, so you may be protected on rate even if you do not reach 80 hours.
My employer never gave me a written notice. Does that matter?
Yes, in two ways. The failure to provide the notice is itself a violation the city can address. And where no notice exists, the employer has no signed record of the rate it stated, so a dispute about the rate is resolved from the other available evidence, including the earnings statements it is required to provide.
Does the ordinance apply if my employer is based outside Minneapolis?
Yes. Coverage follows where the work is performed, not where the employer is located. An employer based elsewhere in Minnesota or in another state is covered as to employees performing the qualifying work inside the city.
What is the difference between this ordinance and the Minneapolis minimum wage ordinance?
They are separate ordinances with separate coverage rules. The wage theft ordinance covers payment, notice and recordkeeping for employees reaching 80 hours a year in the city. The minimum wage ordinance sets the hourly floor and applies at two hours of work in a calendar week. The same employer can be subject to both, and a complaint can raise both.
Can I use the city process and still bring a court case?
Filing a city complaint does not waive your substantive rights under state law, though the same wages cannot be recovered twice. The routes cannot always run at the same time. Rule 3.10 of the Department’s rules bars it from investigating a reported violation once it is aware the employee has already filed a civil action on the same facts, unless that action has since been dismissed without prejudice. Deciding which route to use, and in what sequence, is worth doing before either one is underway.
This article explains a Minneapolis ordinance and Minnesota law in general terms and is not legal advice. Ordinances and their implementing rules are amended, and coverage depends on the particular facts. For advice about your situation, speak with a licensed attorney.
