{"id":5418,"date":"2026-10-11T10:00:08","date_gmt":"2026-10-11T10:00:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/?p=5418"},"modified":"2026-10-16T16:39:34","modified_gmt":"2026-10-16T16:39:34","slug":"reclamacion-municipal-dli-de-minnesota-o-demanda-judicial-como-reclamar-los-salarios-impagados-en-minneapolis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/es\/blog\/reclamacion-municipal-dli-de-minnesota-o-demanda-judicial-como-reclamar-los-salarios-impagados-en-minneapolis\/","title":{"rendered":"Reclamaci\u00f3n municipal, DLI de Minnesota o demanda judicial: c\u00f3mo reclamar los salarios impagados en Minneapolis"},"content":{"rendered":"

Un trabajador de Minneapolis al que se le adeudan salarios tiene m\u00e1s de una v\u00eda a su disposici\u00f3n, y estas v\u00edas difieren en lo que abarcan, en lo que pueden ordenar y en si cubren los honorarios de tu abogado. Las tres principales son: una denuncia ante el Departamento de Derechos Civiles de Minneapolis, una reclamaci\u00f3n salarial ante el Departamento de Trabajo e Industria de Minnesota y una acci\u00f3n civil ante el juzgado de distrito. Existe una cuarta v\u00eda para las infracciones relacionadas con el salario m\u00ednimo federal y las horas extras a trav\u00e9s del Departamento de Trabajo de EE. UU.<\/p>\n

Elegir entre ellas es una decisi\u00f3n pr\u00e1ctica m\u00e1s que una formalidad jur\u00eddica, y los factores que influyen en ella se exponen a continuaci\u00f3n.<\/p>\n

Puedes ponerte en contacto con nosotros llamando al (844) FERRARO<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Las cuatro v\u00edas de un vistazo<\/h2>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
<\/td>\nQueja de Minneapolis<\/strong><\/td>\nReclamaci\u00f3n ante el DLI de Minnesota<\/strong><\/td>\nDemanda ante el tribunal de distrito<\/strong><\/td>\nDivisi\u00f3n de Salarios y Horas del Departamento de Trabajo de EE. UU.<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Qu\u00e9 cubre<\/td>\nOrdenanzas de la ciudad, para trabajo realizado en Minneapolis<\/td>\nLey estatal de salarios en todo el estado<\/td>\nLey estatal de salarios y reclamaciones contractuales<\/td>\nSalario m\u00ednimo federal y horas extra conforme a la FLSA<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Qui\u00e9n investiga<\/td>\nDivisi\u00f3n de Cumplimiento de Normas Laborales<\/td>\nEl comisionado de trabajo e industria<\/td>\nLas partes, mediante el proceso de descubrimiento civil<\/td>\nLa Divisi\u00f3n de Salarios y Horas<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
C\u00f3mo comienza<\/td>\nFormulario de Reporte de Violaci\u00f3n<\/td>\nReclamaci\u00f3n salarial presentada ante el departamento<\/td>\nDemanda presentada directamente, sin necesidad de un tr\u00e1mite previo ante una agencia<\/td>\nQueja ante la divisi\u00f3n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Reparaci\u00f3n principal<\/td>\nSalarios atrasados y, cuando la ordenanza lo autoriza, da\u00f1os liquidados: una cantidad adicional igual conforme a la Ordenanza Municipal de Salario M\u00ednimo, y da\u00f1os liquidados equivalentes a los da\u00f1os compensatorios o $250, lo que sea mayor, conforme a la Ordenanza de Prevenci\u00f3n del Robo de Salarios, con cantidades mayores por una violaci\u00f3n repetida dentro de tres a\u00f1os<\/td>\nSalarios atrasados, propinas y da\u00f1os compensatorios m\u00e1s una cantidad igual en concepto de da\u00f1os liquidados, ordenados por el comisionado conforme a \u00a7 177.27, subd. 7<\/td>\nPara reclamaciones conforme a \u00a7\u00a7 177.21 a 177.44, la cantidad adeudada m\u00e1s una cantidad adicional igual en concepto de da\u00f1os liquidados conforme a \u00a7 177.27, subd. 8; para las secciones del cap\u00edtulo 181 enumeradas en \u00a7 181.171, subd. 1, las reparaciones de la secci\u00f3n infringida m\u00e1s da\u00f1os compensatorios, con honorarios obligatorios conforme a subd. 3; las reclamaciones contractuales incluyen los remedios previstos por el contrato<\/td>\nPago supervisado de salarios m\u00ednimos y horas extra no pagados. Conforme al Field Assistance Bulletin 2025-3, vigente desde el 27 de junio de 2025, la divisi\u00f3n no supervisa el pago de da\u00f1os liquidados en asuntos administrativos; los da\u00f1os liquidados pueden reclamarse cuando el Departamento presenta una acci\u00f3n de cumplimiento ante los tribunales<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Honorarios de su abogado<\/td>\nNo se conceden por esta v\u00eda<\/td>\nNo se conceden al empleado por esta v\u00eda<\/td>\nObligatorios para reclamaciones cubiertas por \u00a7 177.27, subd. 10 o \u00a7 181.171, subd. 3; otras reclamaciones dependen de su propia ley aplicable<\/td>\nNo se conceden por la v\u00eda administrativa<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Costo para usted<\/td>\nNinguno<\/td>\nNinguno<\/td>\nTasas de presentaci\u00f3n, adem\u00e1s del acuerdo de honorarios que establezca con su abogado<\/td>\nNinguno<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Plazo<\/td>\nVar\u00eda seg\u00fan la ordenanza: 1 a\u00f1o para un reporte de salario m\u00ednimo, 2 a\u00f1os para robo de salarios, 3 si fue intencional<\/td>\nGeneralmente 2 a\u00f1os, 3 si se cumple cualquiera de las condiciones legales<\/td>\nGeneralmente 2 a\u00f1os, 3 si se cumple cualquiera de las condiciones legales<\/td>\nGeneralmente 2 a\u00f1os, 3 si fue intencional<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Fuente: C\u00f3digo de Ordenanzas de Minneapolis, T\u00edtulo 2, Cap\u00edtulo 40, Art\u00edculo IV, Salario m\u00ednimo municipal<\/a> y Art\u00edculo V, Prevenci\u00f3n del robo de salarios<\/a> (disposiciones de exenci\u00f3n); Departamento de Derechos Civiles de Minneapolis, normas de aplicaci\u00f3n de la Ordenanza sobre el salario m\u00ednimo municipal<\/a> y orientaciones sobre el robo de salarios<\/a>; Minn. Stat. \u00a7 177.27<\/a>, \u00a7 181.171<\/a> y \u00a7 541.07<\/a>; Departamento de Trabajo de EE. UU., Divisi\u00f3n de Salarios y Horas<\/a> y Bolet\u00edn de Asistencia sobre el Terreno 2025-3. Verificado el 6 de septiembre de 2026.<\/p>\n

Qu\u00e9 abarca realmente la v\u00eda municipal<\/h2>\n

La v\u00eda de Minneapolis se limita a las ordenanzas municipales y al trabajo realizado dentro de los l\u00edmites de la ciudad, lo que supone un \u00e1mbito de aplicaci\u00f3n m\u00e1s restringido que el de la v\u00eda estatal.<\/p>\n

Abarca el salario m\u00ednimo municipal, la ordenanza contra el robo de salarios y la ordenanza sobre permisos por enfermedad y seguridad, y una denuncia puede plantear m\u00e1s de una de estas cuestiones. La divisi\u00f3n investiga sin coste alguno y puede exigir al empleador que presente los registros de n\u00f3minas. Las denuncias se tramitan a trav\u00e9s del 311 o del (612) 673-3000, y el departamento puede investigar una denuncia an\u00f3nima.<\/p>\n

Su limitaci\u00f3n radica en el \u00e1mbito de aplicaci\u00f3n y las medidas correctivas. Las horas trabajadas fuera de Minneapolis quedan fuera de su \u00e1mbito, y no concede el reembolso de los honorarios de los abogados. Tambi\u00e9n se rige por una norma de precedencia, que se explica a continuaci\u00f3n.<\/p>\n

\u00c1mbito de aplicaci\u00f3n de la v\u00eda estatal<\/h2>\n

El Departamento de Trabajo e Industria se encarga de hacer cumplir la legislaci\u00f3n estatal en materia salarial en todo Minnesota, por lo que su \u00e1mbito abarca el trabajo en cualquier lugar del estado, incluidas las horas trabajadas en un barrio perif\u00e9rico que el procedimiento municipal no puede abarcar.<\/p>\n

El comisario puede inspeccionar los registros e interrogar al empresario, y puede ordenar el pago de salarios atrasados y una indemnizaci\u00f3n por da\u00f1os y perjuicios, m\u00e1s una cantidad equivalente en concepto de indemnizaci\u00f3n por da\u00f1os y perjuicios. En caso de infracciones reiteradas o deliberadas, existe una sanci\u00f3n civil adicional de hasta 10 000 d\u00f3lares por infracci\u00f3n y por empleado, aunque dicha sanci\u00f3n se destina al Estado y no a usted.<\/p>\n

Al igual que la v\u00eda municipal, no tiene ning\u00fan coste y no concede el reembolso de los honorarios de su abogado.<\/p>\n

Lo que aporta la v\u00eda judicial<\/h2>\n

El art. 177.27<\/a>, apartado 8, del C\u00f3digo de Minnesota permite a un empleado interponer una demanda civil directamente ante un tribunal de distrito por infracciones de los art\u00edculos 177.21 a 177.44, sin necesidad de presentar primero una reclamaci\u00f3n ante un organismo. El art. 181.171<\/a> del C\u00f3digo de Minnesota establece lo mismo para la mayor parte de la Ley de Pago de Salarios.<\/p>\n

Hay dos caracter\u00edsticas que la distinguen. En el caso de las reclamaciones en virtud de los art\u00edculos 177.21 a 177.44, un empresario que pague menos de los salarios, propinas y horas extras adeudados conforme a dichos art\u00edculos es responsable del importe total, m\u00e1s una cantidad adicional equivalente en concepto de indemnizaci\u00f3n por da\u00f1os y perjuicios. Y la subdivisi\u00f3n 10 establece que un tribunal que constate una infracci\u00f3n deber\u00e1<\/strong> ordenar al empresario que pague al empleado los costes razonables, los desembolsos, los honorarios de los testigos y los honorarios de los abogados. El art\u00edculo 181.171, apartado 3, hace lo mismo con los art\u00edculos enumerados en el apartado 1, que incluyen las disposiciones relativas a la n\u00f3mina y la notificaci\u00f3n salarial, la frecuencia de pago y la \u00faltima n\u00f3mina. Las disposiciones del cap\u00edtulo 181 que no figuran en dicha lista, incluidas las relativas a las deducciones de los art\u00edculos 181.06 y 181.79, no est\u00e1n cubiertas por esta norma y pueden prever recursos distintos.<\/p>\n

El recurso aplicable depende de la ley en virtud de la cual se presente la reclamaci\u00f3n. Una reclamaci\u00f3n basada en una ordenanza municipal o en un contrato no conlleva la indemnizaci\u00f3n por da\u00f1os y perjuicios prevista en el art\u00edculo 177.27, a menos que los mismos hechos constituyan, por s\u00ed mismos, una infracci\u00f3n del cap\u00edtulo 177.<\/p>\n

Las disposiciones sobre honorarios son las que hacen que el c\u00e1lculo al que se enfrenta un empresario ante los tribunales difiera del c\u00e1lculo al que se enfrenta en una investigaci\u00f3n.<\/p>\n

El apartado 9 del art\u00edculo 177.27 a\u00f1ade que una acci\u00f3n judicial puede ser interpuesta por uno o m\u00e1s empleados, lo cual es relevante cuando una pr\u00e1ctica salarial se ha aplicado a todo un grupo.<\/p>\n

La v\u00eda federal y lo que no cubre<\/h2>\n

La Divisi\u00f3n de Salarios y Horas del Departamento de Trabajo de EE. UU. se encarga de hacer cumplir la Ley Federal de Normas Laborales Justas, que establece un salario m\u00ednimo federal y una norma de 40 horas de horas extras para los empleados cubiertos por la misma. Puede investigar y supervisar el pago de salarios atrasados.<\/p>\n

Lo que supervisa administrativamente es m\u00e1s limitado de lo que sol\u00eda ser. En virtud del Bolet\u00edn de Asistencia sobre el Terreno 2025-3, en vigor desde el 27 de junio de 2025, la divisi\u00f3n no supervisa el pago de indemnizaciones por da\u00f1os y perjuicios en asuntos administrativos, y los pagos supervisados se limitan a los salarios m\u00ednimos impagados y a la compensaci\u00f3n por horas extras. Las indemnizaciones por da\u00f1os y perjuicios siguen estando disponibles cuando el Departamento inicia una acci\u00f3n de ejecuci\u00f3n en un litigio, as\u00ed como en una demanda privada interpuesta por un empleado al amparo de la FLSA.<\/p>\n

Sus l\u00edmites son importantes para los trabajadores de Minnesota. La ley federal no hace cumplir la ordenanza de Minneapolis, la de Saint Paul ni las propias leyes salariales de Minnesota, y cuando la legislaci\u00f3n estatal o municipal ofrece m\u00e1s que la ley federal, la v\u00eda federal no cubrir\u00e1 la diferencia. El salario m\u00ednimo de Minnesota y las tarifas municipales superan el m\u00ednimo federal, por lo que, para la mayor\u00eda de los casos de d\u00e9ficit salarial m\u00ednimo en Minneapolis, las v\u00edas estatal y municipal son las que permiten recuperar el dinero.<\/p>\n

La v\u00eda federal es m\u00e1s relevante cuando la cobertura de la FLSA establece algo que la ley estatal no prev\u00e9, como el umbral de 40 horas de horas extras para los trabajadores cubiertos por la ley federal, en lugar de la norma estatal de Minnesota de 48 horas.<\/p>\n

Los honorarios de los abogados marcan la diferencia pr\u00e1ctica<\/h2>\n

Si se comparan las v\u00edas una al lado de la otra, la diferencia sustantiva es menor de lo que parece a primera vista. Las cuatro pueden dar lugar al pago de los salarios adeudados. La v\u00eda municipal de Minneapolis, la v\u00eda de la agencia estatal y la v\u00eda judicial pueden a\u00f1adir indemnizaciones por da\u00f1os y perjuicios cuando la ordenanza o la ley aplicable lo autoricen; la v\u00eda administrativa federal es m\u00e1s restrictiva seg\u00fan el Bolet\u00edn de Asistencia sobre el Terreno 2025-3.<\/p>\n

En el caso de las reclamaciones privadas reguladas por el art\u00edculo 177.27, apartados 8 y 10, y de las disposiciones del cap\u00edtulo 181 enumeradas en el art\u00edculo 181.171, una acci\u00f3n judicial exitosa hace recaer los costes razonables y los honorarios de los abogados sobre el empleador. Las reclamaciones contractuales y otras causas de acci\u00f3n no conllevan autom\u00e1ticamente esas disposiciones sobre honorarios. Las v\u00edas administrativas no conllevan ning\u00fan coste y no conceden el reembolso de sus honorarios. La forma en que esta compensaci\u00f3n se aplica a una reclamaci\u00f3n concreta depende de su envergadura, su complejidad y el n\u00famero de empleados afectados, lo cual es una valoraci\u00f3n espec\u00edfica de cada caso m\u00e1s que una regla general.<\/p>\n

Los plazos no son id\u00e9nticos<\/h2>\n

El \u00a7 541.07<\/a> del C\u00f3digo de Minnesota, cl\u00e1usula (5), establece un plazo predeterminado de dos a\u00f1os para las reclamaciones por salarios, horas extras, da\u00f1os y perjuicios, honorarios o sanciones, que se ampl\u00eda a tres a\u00f1os si el empleador no ha cumplido el plazo fijado por el departamento para presentar los registros de n\u00f3minas, o si el pago insuficiente fue intencionado y no accidental. Los plazos de Minneapolis, por el contrario, var\u00edan seg\u00fan la ordenanza: seg\u00fan la norma 3.4 de las normas sobre el salario m\u00ednimo, un informe sobre el salario m\u00ednimo debe presentarse generalmente en el plazo de un a\u00f1o, mientras que la Ordenanza de Prevenci\u00f3n del Robo de Salarios establece un plazo de dos a\u00f1os, que se ampl\u00eda a tres en caso de presunta infracci\u00f3n intencionada. Otras ordenanzas municipales tienen sus propias normas de presentaci\u00f3n. Una reclamaci\u00f3n contractual puede regirse de forma diferente.<\/p>\n

Dado que los plazos comienzan a contar a partir de la infracci\u00f3n, la parte m\u00e1s antigua de un d\u00e9ficit prolongado prescribe primero, mientras que las semanas m\u00e1s recientes siguen estando disponibles.<\/p>\n

Utilizar m\u00e1s de una v\u00eda y la norma de plazos de Minneapolis<\/h2>\n

Presentar una reclamaci\u00f3n por una v\u00eda no supone la renuncia a tus derechos sustantivos en virtud de las dem\u00e1s, aunque no se pueden recuperar dos veces los mismos salarios y una agencia que haya resuelto una reclamaci\u00f3n ya habr\u00e1 abordado dichos salarios.<\/p>\n

Preservar sus opciones no es lo mismo que ejercerlas simult\u00e1neamente. La norma 3.10 del Reglamento del Departamento de Derechos Civiles de Minneapolis establece que el Departamento no investigar\u00e1 una infracci\u00f3n denunciada cometida por un empleado o en su nombre si tiene conocimiento de que dicho empleado ha iniciado una acci\u00f3n civil derivada de los mismos hechos o circunstancias, a menos que la acci\u00f3n civil sea desestimada primero sin perjuicio.<\/strong> Un empleador puede notificar al Departamento que se ha iniciado una acci\u00f3n civil presentando una copia de la demanda.<\/p>\n

La consecuencia es pr\u00e1ctica. Una investigaci\u00f3n municipal y una acci\u00f3n ante un tribunal de distrito sobre los mismos hechos no est\u00e1n concebidas para desarrollarse en paralelo, y presentar primero la demanda puede poner fin a la investigaci\u00f3n. Esto hace que el orden sea una decisi\u00f3n que debe tomarse deliberadamente desde el principio, en lugar de una a la que se llegue m\u00e1s tarde.<\/p>\n

C\u00f3mo elegir<\/h2>\n

Normalmente, varias preguntas aclaran la cuesti\u00f3n. \u00bfD\u00f3nde se realiz\u00f3 el trabajo?, ya que las horas de trabajo para la ciudad y las que no lo son se tratan de forma diferente. \u00bfEn virtud de qu\u00e9 ley se presenta la reclamaci\u00f3n?, ya que eso determina la reparaci\u00f3n. Qu\u00e9 parte de las pruebas se encuentra en los registros del empleador, ya que las autoridades pueden exigir el acceso a los registros sin necesidad de una demanda. Cu\u00e1ntas personas se ven afectadas, ya que una demanda colectiva cambia la naturaleza del caso. Y en Minneapolis, por qu\u00e9 v\u00eda se inicia el procedimiento, dada la restricci\u00f3n temporal de la Norma 3.10 mencionada anteriormente.<\/p>\n

Las obras plantean estas cuestiones constantemente, y nuestra p\u00e1gina sobre salarios impagados a trabajadores de la construcci\u00f3n de Minneapolis<\/a> aborda un contexto en el que el trabajo se desarrolla en varias jurisdicciones. Nuestra p\u00e1gina sobre reclamaciones salariales en Minneapolis<\/a> explica en qu\u00e9 consiste la v\u00eda judicial, y la p\u00e1gina del bufete sobre derecho laboral en Minneapolis<\/a> abarca las dem\u00e1s \u00e1reas de las que nos ocupamos en la ciudad.<\/p>\n

Preguntas frecuentes<\/h2>\n

\u00bfTengo que presentar una reclamaci\u00f3n ante una agencia antes de acudir a los tribunales?<\/h3>\n

No. El art\u00edculo 177.27, apartado 8, permite interponer una acci\u00f3n civil directamente ante el tribunal de distrito, y el art\u00edculo 181.171 hace lo mismo para la mayor parte de la Ley de Pago de Salarios. La presentaci\u00f3n ante una agencia es una alternativa, no un requisito previo.<\/p>\n

\u00bfQu\u00e9 v\u00eda resulta m\u00e1s rentable?<\/h3>\n

La v\u00eda judicial es la \u00fanica que puede hacer recaer los honorarios de su abogado sobre el empleador, y lo hace en el caso de las reclamaciones amparadas por el art\u00edculo 177.27, apartado 10, o el art\u00edculo 181.171, apartado 3, y no para todas las reclamaciones presentadas ante los tribunales. Para las reclamaciones en virtud de los art\u00edculos 177.21 a 177.44, tambi\u00e9n conlleva una cantidad adicional equivalente en concepto de indemnizaci\u00f3n por da\u00f1os y perjuicios. Una resoluci\u00f3n de un organismo estatal en virtud del art\u00edculo 177.27, apartado 7, tambi\u00e9n puede incluir un importe adicional equivalente. La v\u00eda de los organismos federales es m\u00e1s limitada: seg\u00fan el Bolet\u00edn de Asistencia sobre el Terreno 2025-3, la Divisi\u00f3n de Salarios y Horas supervisa \u00fanicamente el pago de los salarios m\u00ednimos y las horas extras impagados, y no supervisa los da\u00f1os y perjuicios en los asuntos administrativos. La comparaci\u00f3n depende de la reclamaci\u00f3n.<\/p>\n

\u00bfPuedo presentar una reclamaci\u00f3n ante el ayuntamiento y ante el estado?<\/h3>\n

Presentar una reclamaci\u00f3n ante una de las dos instancias no supone la renuncia a tus derechos sustantivos ante las dem\u00e1s, aunque no se pueden recuperar dos veces los mismos salarios. Es posible que no se puedan tramitar al mismo tiempo: la Norma 3.10 de Minneapolis es el escollo: el Departamento no puede investigar una vez que tiene conocimiento de que ya est\u00e1 pendiente una acci\u00f3n civil sobre los mismos hechos, a menos que dicha acci\u00f3n haya sido desestimada sin perjuicio. Aclara la interacci\u00f3n antes de presentar la segunda reclamaci\u00f3n.<\/p>\n

\u00bfQu\u00e9 ocurre si trabaj\u00e9 en Minneapolis y en un barrio perif\u00e9rico?<\/h3>\n

El procedimiento municipal solo abarca las horas trabajadas dentro de Minneapolis. Los procedimientos estatales abarcan todas ellas. Llevar tu propio registro de qu\u00e9 horas se trabajaron y d\u00f3nde es lo que permite esa distribuci\u00f3n posteriormente.<\/p>\n

\u00bfMe costar\u00e1 algo presentar la reclamaci\u00f3n?<\/h3>\n

Los procedimientos ante las agencias municipales, estatales y federales son gratuitos. Una acci\u00f3n ante un tribunal de distrito conlleva tasas de tramitaci\u00f3n, y el acuerdo sobre los honorarios con el abogado debe acordarse por escrito desde el principio. En el caso de las reclamaciones amparadas por el art\u00edculo 177.27, apartado 10, o el art\u00edculo 181.171, apartado 3, se pueden reclamar al empleador los gastos razonables y los honorarios de los abogados cuando se constate una infracci\u00f3n; las reclamaciones contractuales y otras causas de acci\u00f3n no se rigen autom\u00e1ticamente por dichas disposiciones.<\/p>\n

Este art\u00edculo explica en t\u00e9rminos generales la legislaci\u00f3n de Minnesota, una ordenanza de Minneapolis y un procedimiento de una agencia federal, y no constituye asesoramiento jur\u00eddico. La v\u00eda m\u00e1s adecuada para una reclamaci\u00f3n concreta depende de los hechos del caso. Para obtener asesoramiento sobre su situaci\u00f3n, consulte a un abogado colegiado.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Un trabajador de Minneapolis al que se le adeudan salarios tiene m\u00e1s de una v\u00eda a su disposici\u00f3n, y estas v\u00edas difieren en lo que abarcan, en lo que pueden ordenar y en si cubren los honorarios de tu abogado. Las tres principales son: una denuncia ante el Departamento de Derechos Civiles de Minneapolis, una reclamaci\u00f3n salarial ante el Departamento de Trabajo e Industria de Minnesota y una acci\u00f3n civil ante el juzgado de distrito. Existe una cuarta v\u00eda para las infracciones relacionadas con el salario m\u00ednimo federal y las horas extras a trav\u00e9s del Departamento de Trabajo de EE. UU.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":19,"featured_media":5356,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mpil_keywords":"","_mpil_exclude":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[158],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5418","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-sin-categoria"],"yoast_head":"\nReclamaci\u00f3n municipal, DLI de Minnesota o demanda judicial - Ferraro Vega Employment Lawyers, Inc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Una reclamaci\u00f3n municipal, una reclamaci\u00f3n ante la DLI estatal, una demanda ante un tribunal de distrito o ante el Departamento de Trabajo de EE. UU. Qu\u00e9 abarca cada v\u00eda, qu\u00e9 indemnizaci\u00f3n se concede y qu\u00e9 plazo es aplicable.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/blog\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"es_ES\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Reclamaci\u00f3n municipal, DLI de Minnesota o demanda judicial - Ferraro Vega Employment Lawyers, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Una reclamaci\u00f3n municipal, una reclamaci\u00f3n ante la DLI estatal, una demanda ante un tribunal de distrito o ante el Departamento de Trabajo de EE. UU. Qu\u00e9 abarca cada v\u00eda, qu\u00e9 indemnizaci\u00f3n se concede y qu\u00e9 plazo es aplicable.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/blog\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Ferraro Vega Employment Lawyers, Inc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ferrarovega\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/ferraronicholas\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-10-11T10:00:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-10-16T16:39:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/shutterstock_2056414424.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1000\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"563\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Nicholas J. Ferraro\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@ferrarovega\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@ferrarovega\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Nicholas J. Ferraro\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutos\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/blog\\\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/blog\\\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Nicholas J. Ferraro\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8683c49767db85170682d8c3e3b15ade\"},\"headline\":\"Reclamaci\u00f3n municipal, DLI de Minnesota o demanda judicial: c\u00f3mo reclamar los salarios impagados en Minneapolis\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-11T10:00:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-16T16:39:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/blog\\\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":3116,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/blog\\\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/shutterstock_2056414424.jpg\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/blog\\\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/blog\\\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\\\/\",\"name\":\"Reclamaci\u00f3n municipal, DLI de Minnesota o demanda judicial - Ferraro Vega Employment Lawyers, Inc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/blog\\\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/blog\\\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/shutterstock_2056414424.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-10-11T10:00:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-10-16T16:39:34+00:00\",\"description\":\"Una reclamaci\u00f3n municipal, una reclamaci\u00f3n ante la DLI estatal, una demanda ante un tribunal de distrito o ante el Departamento de Trabajo de EE. UU. Qu\u00e9 abarca cada v\u00eda, qu\u00e9 indemnizaci\u00f3n se concede y qu\u00e9 plazo es aplicable.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/blog\\\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/blog\\\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/blog\\\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/shutterstock_2056414424.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/09\\\/shutterstock_2056414424.jpg\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":563,\"caption\":\"A Minneapolis worker owed wages has more than one route, and the routes differ in what they cover, what they can order and whether they pay your attorney fees. The main three are a complaint to the Minneapolis Department of Civil Rights, a wage claim with the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, and a civil action in district court. A fourth exists for federal minimum wage and overtime violations through the U.S. Department of Labor. Choosing between them is a practical decision rather than a legal formality, and the factors that bear on it are set out below. The Four Routes at a Glance Minneapolis complaint Minnesota DLI claim District court action U.S. DOL Wage and Hour Division What it covers City ordinances, for work performed in Minneapolis State wage law statewide State wage law, and contract claims Federal minimum wage and overtime under the FLSA Who investigates Labor Standards Enforcement Division The commissioner of labor and industry The parties, through civil discovery The Wage and Hour Division How it starts Report of Violation form Wage claim filed with the department Complaint filed directly, no agency step required Complaint to the division Core remedy Back pay and, where the ordinance authorizes it, liquidated damages: an additional equal amount under the Municipal Minimum Wage Ordinance, and liquidated damages equal to compensatory damages or $250, whichever is greater, under the Wage Theft Prevention Ordinance, with higher amounts for a repeat violation within three years Back pay, gratuities and compensatory damages plus an equal amount as liquidated damages, ordered by the commissioner under \u00a7 177.27, subd. 7 For \u00a7\u00a7 177.21 to 177.44 claims, the amount owed plus an equal additional amount as liquidated damages under \u00a7 177.27, subd. 8; for the chapter 181 sections listed in \u00a7 181.171, subd. 1, the remedies of the section violated plus compensatory damages, with mandatory fees under subd. 3; contract claims carry contract remedies Supervised payment of unpaid minimum wages and overtime. Under Field Assistance Bulletin 2025-3, effective June 27, 2025, the division does not supervise payment of liquidated damages in administrative matters; liquidated damages may be sought where the Department brings an enforcement action in litigation Your attorney fees Not awarded through this route Not awarded to the employee through this route Mandatory for claims covered by \u00a7 177.27, subd. 10 or \u00a7 181.171, subd. 3; other claims depend on their own law Not awarded through the agency route Cost to you None None Filing fees, plus whatever fee arrangement you make with counsel None Deadline Varies by ordinance: 1 year for a minimum wage report, 2 years for wage theft, 3 if willful Generally 2 years, 3 on either statutory condition Generally 2 years, 3 on either statutory condition Generally 2 years, 3 if willful Source: Minneapolis Code of Ordinances, Title 2, Chapter 40, Article IV, Municipal Minimum Wage and Article V, Wage Theft Prevention (relief provisions); Minneapolis Department of Civil Rights, rules implementing the Municipal Minimum Wage Ordinance and wage theft guidance; Minn. Stat. \u00a7 177.27, \u00a7 181.171 and \u00a7 541.07; U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division and Field Assistance Bulletin 2025-3. Verified September 6, 2026. What the City Route Actually Reaches The Minneapolis route is limited to city ordinances and to work performed inside city limits, which is a narrower scope than the state route. It reaches the city minimum wage, the wage theft ordinance and the sick and safe time ordinance, and one report can raise more than one of them. The division investigates at no cost and can require the employer to produce payroll records. Complaints go through 311 or (612) 673-3000, and the department may investigate an anonymous report. Its limitation is scope and remedy. Hours worked outside Minneapolis are outside it, and it does not award your attorney fees. It also carries a sequencing rule, covered below. What the State Route Reaches The Department of Labor and Industry enforces the state wage statutes across Minnesota, so it reaches work anywhere in the state, including hours in a suburb the city process cannot touch. The commissioner can inspect records and question the employer, and can order back pay and compensatory damages plus an equal amount as liquidated damages. For repeated or willful violations there is an additional civil penalty of up to $10,000 per violation per employee, though that penalty runs to the state rather than to you. Like the city route, it costs nothing and does not award your attorney fees. What the Court Route Adds Minn. Stat. \u00a7 177.27, subd. 8 allows an employee to bring a civil action directly in district court for violations of sections 177.21 to 177.44, with no requirement to file with an agency first. Minn. Stat. \u00a7 181.171 does the same for most of the Payment of Wages Act. Two features distinguish it. For claims under sections 177.21 to 177.44, an employer that pays less than the wages, gratuities and overtime owed under those sections is liable for the full amount plus an equal additional amount as liquidated damages. And subdivision 10 provides that a court finding a violation shall order the employer to pay the employee's reasonable costs, disbursements, witness fees and attorney fees. Section 181.171, subd. 3 does the same for the sections listed in subdivision 1, which include the earnings statement and wage notice provision, pay frequency and final pay. Chapter 181 provisions outside that list, including the deduction sections at \u00a7\u00a7 181.06 and 181.79, are not covered by it and may provide separate remedies. Which remedy applies depends on which statute the claim arises under. A claim resting on a city ordinance or on a contract does not carry the \u00a7 177.27 liquidated damages measure unless the same facts independently establish a chapter 177 violation. The fee provisions are what make the arithmetic an employer faces in court different from the arithmetic it faces in an investigation. Section 177.27, subd. 9 adds that an action may be brought by one or more employees, which matters where a pay practice was applied across a group. The Federal Route, and What It Does Not Cover The U.S. Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division enforces the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, which sets a federal minimum wage and a 40-hour overtime standard for covered employees. It can investigate and supervise the payment of back wages. What it supervises administratively is narrower than it used to be. Under Field Assistance Bulletin 2025-3, effective June 27, 2025, the division does not supervise the payment of liquidated damages in administrative matters, and supervised payments are limited to unpaid minimum wages and overtime compensation. Liquidated damages remain available where the Department brings an enforcement action in litigation, and in a private suit brought by an employee under the FLSA. Its limits matter for Minnesota workers. Federal law does not enforce the Minneapolis ordinance, the Saint Paul ordinance or Minnesota's own wage statutes, and where state or city law provides more than federal law, the federal route will not deliver the difference. Minnesota's minimum wage and its city rates exceed the federal minimum, so for most minimum wage shortfalls in Minneapolis the state and city routes are the ones that reach the money. The federal route is most relevant where FLSA coverage produces something state law does not, such as the 40-hour overtime threshold for employees covered by federal law rather than Minnesota's 48-hour state standard. Attorney Fees Are the Practical Difference Set the routes side by side and the substantive difference is narrower than it first appears. All four can result in payment of wages owed. The Minneapolis city route, the state agency route and the court route can each add liquidated damages where the governing ordinance or statute authorizes them; the federal administrative route is narrower under Field Assistance Bulletin 2025-3. For private claims covered by \u00a7 177.27, subds. 8 and 10, and for the chapter 181 provisions listed in \u00a7 181.171, a successful court action shifts reasonable costs and attorney fees to the employer. Contract claims and other causes of action do not automatically carry those fee provisions. The agency routes cost nothing to use and do not award your fees. How that trade-off applies to a particular claim depends on its size, its complexity and how many employees are affected, which is a case-specific assessment rather than a rule of thumb. Deadlines Are Not Identical Minn. Stat. \u00a7 541.07, clause (5) gives two years as the default for wage, overtime, damages, fees or penalties claims, stretching to three if the employer missed a department deadline for producing payroll records, or if the underpayment was willful rather than accidental. The Minneapolis windows, by contrast, vary by ordinance: under Rule 3.4 of the minimum wage rules a minimum wage report generally must be filed within one year, while the Wage Theft Prevention Ordinance uses two years, extending to three for an alleged willful violation. Other city ordinances have their own filing rules. A contract claim may run differently again. Because the periods run from the violation, the oldest part of a long-running shortfall expires first while the newer weeks remain available. Using More Than One, and the Minneapolis Timing Rule Filing with one route does not waive your substantive rights under the others, though the same wages cannot be recovered twice and an agency that has resolved a claim will have addressed those wages. Preserving your options is not the same as running them concurrently. Rule 3.10 of the Minneapolis Department of Civil Rights rules provides that the Department shall not investigate a reported violation made by or on behalf of an employee if it knows the employee has commenced a civil action arising from the same facts or circumstances, unless the civil action is first dismissed without prejudice. An employer may notify the Department that a civil action has been commenced by providing a copy of the complaint. The consequence is practical. A city investigation and a district court action on the same facts are not designed to proceed side by side, and starting the lawsuit first can end the investigation. That makes the order a decision to take deliberately at the outset rather than one to arrive at later. How to Choose Several questions usually settle it. Where was the work performed, since city hours and non-city hours are treated differently. Which statute does the claim arise under, since that determines the remedy. How much of the evidence sits in the employer's records, since agencies can compel records without a lawsuit. How many people are affected, since a group changes the shape of a case. And in Minneapolis, which route you start with, given the Rule 3.10 timing constraint above. Job sites raise these questions constantly, and our page on unpaid wages for Minneapolis construction workers covers a setting where the work moves between jurisdictions. Our page on Minneapolis wage claims explains what the court route involves, and the firm's Minneapolis employment law page covers the other areas we handle in the city. Frequently Asked Questions Do I have to file with an agency before going to court? No. Section 177.27, subd. 8 allows a civil action directly in district court, and \u00a7 181.171 does the same for most of the Payment of Wages Act. An agency filing is an alternative rather than a prerequisite. Which route pays the most? The court route is the only one that can shift your attorney fees to the employer, and it does so for claims covered by \u00a7 177.27, subd. 10 or \u00a7 181.171, subd. 3 rather than for every claim brought in court. For claims under sections 177.21 to 177.44 it also carries the equal additional amount as liquidated damages. A state agency order under \u00a7 177.27, subd. 7 can also include an equal additional amount. The federal agency route is narrower: under Field Assistance Bulletin 2025-3 the Wage and Hour Division supervises payment of unpaid minimum wages and overtime only, and does not supervise liquidated damages in administrative matters. The comparison depends on the claim. Can I file with the city and the state? Filing with one does not waive your substantive rights under the others, though the same wages cannot be recovered twice. They may not be able to run at the same time: Minneapolis Rule 3.10 is the wrinkle: the Department cannot investigate once it learns a civil action on the same facts is already pending, unless that action has been dismissed without prejudice. Sort out the interaction before the second filing goes in. What if I worked in Minneapolis and in a suburb? The city process reaches only the hours worked inside Minneapolis. The state routes reach all of them. Keeping your own record of which hours were worked where is what makes that allocation possible later. Will filing cost me anything? The city, state and federal agency routes are free. A district court action involves filing fees, and the fee arrangement with counsel is a matter to agree in writing at the outset. For claims covered by \u00a7 177.27, subd. 10 or \u00a7 181.171, subd. 3, reasonable costs and attorney fees are recoverable from the employer when a violation is found; contract claims and other causes of action do not automatically carry those provisions. This article explains Minnesota law, a Minneapolis ordinance and a federal agency process in general terms and is not legal advice. Which route fits a particular claim depends on its facts. For advice about your situation, speak with a licensed attorney.\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/blog\\\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Reclamaci\u00f3n municipal, DLI de Minnesota o demanda judicial: c\u00f3mo reclamar los salarios impagados en Minneapolis\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Ferraro Vega Employment Lawyers, Inc.\",\"description\":\"Ferraro Vega San Diego Employment Lawyers\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"es\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Ferraro Vega Employment Lawyers, Inc.\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/01\\\/Ferraro-Vega-Employment-Lawyers-Logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2021\\\/01\\\/Ferraro-Vega-Employment-Lawyers-Logo.png\",\"width\":300,\"height\":300,\"caption\":\"Ferraro Vega Employment Lawyers, Inc.\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/ferrarovega\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/ferrarovega\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/ferraro-vega-employment-lawyers\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/8683c49767db85170682d8c3e3b15ade\",\"name\":\"Nicholas J. Ferraro\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"es\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/pic-Nicholas-Ferraro-single-96x96.png\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/pic-Nicholas-Ferraro-single-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2024\\\/06\\\/pic-Nicholas-Ferraro-single-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"Nicholas J. Ferraro\"},\"description\":\"Nicholas J. Ferraro is a skilled labor and employment lawyer and the founder of Ferraro Vega Employment Lawyers, Inc. Based in San Diego, he focuses on representing employees in class action and collective litigation cases. Education: Mr. Ferraro attended the University of San Diego School of Law, where he was a member of the San Diego Law Review. Experience: Over a decade of legal practice, representing more than 100,000 employees. Court Admissions: Mr. Ferraro represents his clients throughout the State of California and the State of Washington. He is a member of the State Bar of California. Community Involvement: Active member of the California Employment Lawyers Association and the San Diego County Bar Association.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/about-our-firm\\\/attorneys\\\/nicholas-ferraro\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.linkedin.com\\\/in\\\/ferraronicholas\",\"https:\\\/\\\/apps.calbar.ca.gov\\\/attorney\\\/Licensee\\\/Detail\\\/306528\",\"https:\\\/\\\/lawyers.justia.com\\\/lawyer\\\/nicholas-j-ferraro-1516289\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.avvo.com\\\/attorneys\\\/92108-ca-nicholas-ferraro-4750530.html\",\"https:\\\/\\\/profiles.superlawyers.com\\\/california\\\/san-diego\\\/lawyer\\\/nicholas-j-ferraro\\\/fe87f689-79f8-46a5-978a-dfa6e277e589.html\",\"https:\\\/\\\/t.lawlink.com\\\/profile\\\/53025\\\/nicholas-ferraro\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.zoominfo.com\\\/p\\\/Nicholas-Ferraro\\\/2016107549\",\"https:\\\/\\\/lawyers.uslegal.com\\\/attorney\\\/nicholas-ferraro-22315066\\\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/ferrarovega.com\\\/es\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/nick-ferraro\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Reclamaci\u00f3n municipal, DLI de Minnesota o demanda judicial - Ferraro Vega Employment Lawyers, Inc.","description":"Una reclamaci\u00f3n municipal, una reclamaci\u00f3n ante la DLI estatal, una demanda ante un tribunal de distrito o ante el Departamento de Trabajo de EE. UU. Qu\u00e9 abarca cada v\u00eda, qu\u00e9 indemnizaci\u00f3n se concede y qu\u00e9 plazo es aplicable.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/blog\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\/","og_locale":"es_ES","og_type":"article","og_title":"Reclamaci\u00f3n municipal, DLI de Minnesota o demanda judicial - Ferraro Vega Employment Lawyers, Inc.","og_description":"Una reclamaci\u00f3n municipal, una reclamaci\u00f3n ante la DLI estatal, una demanda ante un tribunal de distrito o ante el Departamento de Trabajo de EE. UU. Qu\u00e9 abarca cada v\u00eda, qu\u00e9 indemnizaci\u00f3n se concede y qu\u00e9 plazo es aplicable.","og_url":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/blog\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\/","og_site_name":"Ferraro Vega Employment Lawyers, Inc.","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ferrarovega\/","article_author":"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/ferraronicholas","article_published_time":"2026-10-11T10:00:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-10-16T16:39:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1000,"height":563,"url":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/shutterstock_2056414424.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Nicholas J. Ferraro","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@ferrarovega","twitter_site":"@ferrarovega","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Nicholas J. Ferraro","Est. reading time":"13 minutos"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/blog\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/blog\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\/"},"author":{"name":"Nicholas J. Ferraro","@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8683c49767db85170682d8c3e3b15ade"},"headline":"Reclamaci\u00f3n municipal, DLI de Minnesota o demanda judicial: c\u00f3mo reclamar los salarios impagados en Minneapolis","datePublished":"2026-10-11T10:00:08+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-16T16:39:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/blog\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\/"},"wordCount":3116,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/blog\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/shutterstock_2056414424.jpg","inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/blog\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\/","url":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/blog\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\/","name":"Reclamaci\u00f3n municipal, DLI de Minnesota o demanda judicial - Ferraro Vega Employment Lawyers, Inc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/blog\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/blog\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/shutterstock_2056414424.jpg","datePublished":"2026-10-11T10:00:08+00:00","dateModified":"2026-10-16T16:39:34+00:00","description":"Una reclamaci\u00f3n municipal, una reclamaci\u00f3n ante la DLI estatal, una demanda ante un tribunal de distrito o ante el Departamento de Trabajo de EE. UU. Qu\u00e9 abarca cada v\u00eda, qu\u00e9 indemnizaci\u00f3n se concede y qu\u00e9 plazo es aplicable.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/blog\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"es","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/blog\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/blog\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/shutterstock_2056414424.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/shutterstock_2056414424.jpg","width":1000,"height":563,"caption":"A Minneapolis worker owed wages has more than one route, and the routes differ in what they cover, what they can order and whether they pay your attorney fees. The main three are a complaint to the Minneapolis Department of Civil Rights, a wage claim with the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, and a civil action in district court. A fourth exists for federal minimum wage and overtime violations through the U.S. Department of Labor. Choosing between them is a practical decision rather than a legal formality, and the factors that bear on it are set out below. The Four Routes at a Glance Minneapolis complaint Minnesota DLI claim District court action U.S. DOL Wage and Hour Division What it covers City ordinances, for work performed in Minneapolis State wage law statewide State wage law, and contract claims Federal minimum wage and overtime under the FLSA Who investigates Labor Standards Enforcement Division The commissioner of labor and industry The parties, through civil discovery The Wage and Hour Division How it starts Report of Violation form Wage claim filed with the department Complaint filed directly, no agency step required Complaint to the division Core remedy Back pay and, where the ordinance authorizes it, liquidated damages: an additional equal amount under the Municipal Minimum Wage Ordinance, and liquidated damages equal to compensatory damages or $250, whichever is greater, under the Wage Theft Prevention Ordinance, with higher amounts for a repeat violation within three years Back pay, gratuities and compensatory damages plus an equal amount as liquidated damages, ordered by the commissioner under \u00a7 177.27, subd. 7 For \u00a7\u00a7 177.21 to 177.44 claims, the amount owed plus an equal additional amount as liquidated damages under \u00a7 177.27, subd. 8; for the chapter 181 sections listed in \u00a7 181.171, subd. 1, the remedies of the section violated plus compensatory damages, with mandatory fees under subd. 3; contract claims carry contract remedies Supervised payment of unpaid minimum wages and overtime. Under Field Assistance Bulletin 2025-3, effective June 27, 2025, the division does not supervise payment of liquidated damages in administrative matters; liquidated damages may be sought where the Department brings an enforcement action in litigation Your attorney fees Not awarded through this route Not awarded to the employee through this route Mandatory for claims covered by \u00a7 177.27, subd. 10 or \u00a7 181.171, subd. 3; other claims depend on their own law Not awarded through the agency route Cost to you None None Filing fees, plus whatever fee arrangement you make with counsel None Deadline Varies by ordinance: 1 year for a minimum wage report, 2 years for wage theft, 3 if willful Generally 2 years, 3 on either statutory condition Generally 2 years, 3 on either statutory condition Generally 2 years, 3 if willful Source: Minneapolis Code of Ordinances, Title 2, Chapter 40, Article IV, Municipal Minimum Wage and Article V, Wage Theft Prevention (relief provisions); Minneapolis Department of Civil Rights, rules implementing the Municipal Minimum Wage Ordinance and wage theft guidance; Minn. Stat. \u00a7 177.27, \u00a7 181.171 and \u00a7 541.07; U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division and Field Assistance Bulletin 2025-3. Verified September 6, 2026. What the City Route Actually Reaches The Minneapolis route is limited to city ordinances and to work performed inside city limits, which is a narrower scope than the state route. It reaches the city minimum wage, the wage theft ordinance and the sick and safe time ordinance, and one report can raise more than one of them. The division investigates at no cost and can require the employer to produce payroll records. Complaints go through 311 or (612) 673-3000, and the department may investigate an anonymous report. Its limitation is scope and remedy. Hours worked outside Minneapolis are outside it, and it does not award your attorney fees. It also carries a sequencing rule, covered below. What the State Route Reaches The Department of Labor and Industry enforces the state wage statutes across Minnesota, so it reaches work anywhere in the state, including hours in a suburb the city process cannot touch. The commissioner can inspect records and question the employer, and can order back pay and compensatory damages plus an equal amount as liquidated damages. For repeated or willful violations there is an additional civil penalty of up to $10,000 per violation per employee, though that penalty runs to the state rather than to you. Like the city route, it costs nothing and does not award your attorney fees. What the Court Route Adds Minn. Stat. \u00a7 177.27, subd. 8 allows an employee to bring a civil action directly in district court for violations of sections 177.21 to 177.44, with no requirement to file with an agency first. Minn. Stat. \u00a7 181.171 does the same for most of the Payment of Wages Act. Two features distinguish it. For claims under sections 177.21 to 177.44, an employer that pays less than the wages, gratuities and overtime owed under those sections is liable for the full amount plus an equal additional amount as liquidated damages. And subdivision 10 provides that a court finding a violation shall order the employer to pay the employee's reasonable costs, disbursements, witness fees and attorney fees. Section 181.171, subd. 3 does the same for the sections listed in subdivision 1, which include the earnings statement and wage notice provision, pay frequency and final pay. Chapter 181 provisions outside that list, including the deduction sections at \u00a7\u00a7 181.06 and 181.79, are not covered by it and may provide separate remedies. Which remedy applies depends on which statute the claim arises under. A claim resting on a city ordinance or on a contract does not carry the \u00a7 177.27 liquidated damages measure unless the same facts independently establish a chapter 177 violation. The fee provisions are what make the arithmetic an employer faces in court different from the arithmetic it faces in an investigation. Section 177.27, subd. 9 adds that an action may be brought by one or more employees, which matters where a pay practice was applied across a group. The Federal Route, and What It Does Not Cover The U.S. Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division enforces the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, which sets a federal minimum wage and a 40-hour overtime standard for covered employees. It can investigate and supervise the payment of back wages. What it supervises administratively is narrower than it used to be. Under Field Assistance Bulletin 2025-3, effective June 27, 2025, the division does not supervise the payment of liquidated damages in administrative matters, and supervised payments are limited to unpaid minimum wages and overtime compensation. Liquidated damages remain available where the Department brings an enforcement action in litigation, and in a private suit brought by an employee under the FLSA. Its limits matter for Minnesota workers. Federal law does not enforce the Minneapolis ordinance, the Saint Paul ordinance or Minnesota's own wage statutes, and where state or city law provides more than federal law, the federal route will not deliver the difference. Minnesota's minimum wage and its city rates exceed the federal minimum, so for most minimum wage shortfalls in Minneapolis the state and city routes are the ones that reach the money. The federal route is most relevant where FLSA coverage produces something state law does not, such as the 40-hour overtime threshold for employees covered by federal law rather than Minnesota's 48-hour state standard. Attorney Fees Are the Practical Difference Set the routes side by side and the substantive difference is narrower than it first appears. All four can result in payment of wages owed. The Minneapolis city route, the state agency route and the court route can each add liquidated damages where the governing ordinance or statute authorizes them; the federal administrative route is narrower under Field Assistance Bulletin 2025-3. For private claims covered by \u00a7 177.27, subds. 8 and 10, and for the chapter 181 provisions listed in \u00a7 181.171, a successful court action shifts reasonable costs and attorney fees to the employer. Contract claims and other causes of action do not automatically carry those fee provisions. The agency routes cost nothing to use and do not award your fees. How that trade-off applies to a particular claim depends on its size, its complexity and how many employees are affected, which is a case-specific assessment rather than a rule of thumb. Deadlines Are Not Identical Minn. Stat. \u00a7 541.07, clause (5) gives two years as the default for wage, overtime, damages, fees or penalties claims, stretching to three if the employer missed a department deadline for producing payroll records, or if the underpayment was willful rather than accidental. The Minneapolis windows, by contrast, vary by ordinance: under Rule 3.4 of the minimum wage rules a minimum wage report generally must be filed within one year, while the Wage Theft Prevention Ordinance uses two years, extending to three for an alleged willful violation. Other city ordinances have their own filing rules. A contract claim may run differently again. Because the periods run from the violation, the oldest part of a long-running shortfall expires first while the newer weeks remain available. Using More Than One, and the Minneapolis Timing Rule Filing with one route does not waive your substantive rights under the others, though the same wages cannot be recovered twice and an agency that has resolved a claim will have addressed those wages. Preserving your options is not the same as running them concurrently. Rule 3.10 of the Minneapolis Department of Civil Rights rules provides that the Department shall not investigate a reported violation made by or on behalf of an employee if it knows the employee has commenced a civil action arising from the same facts or circumstances, unless the civil action is first dismissed without prejudice. An employer may notify the Department that a civil action has been commenced by providing a copy of the complaint. The consequence is practical. A city investigation and a district court action on the same facts are not designed to proceed side by side, and starting the lawsuit first can end the investigation. That makes the order a decision to take deliberately at the outset rather than one to arrive at later. How to Choose Several questions usually settle it. Where was the work performed, since city hours and non-city hours are treated differently. Which statute does the claim arise under, since that determines the remedy. How much of the evidence sits in the employer's records, since agencies can compel records without a lawsuit. How many people are affected, since a group changes the shape of a case. And in Minneapolis, which route you start with, given the Rule 3.10 timing constraint above. Job sites raise these questions constantly, and our page on unpaid wages for Minneapolis construction workers covers a setting where the work moves between jurisdictions. Our page on Minneapolis wage claims explains what the court route involves, and the firm's Minneapolis employment law page covers the other areas we handle in the city. Frequently Asked Questions Do I have to file with an agency before going to court? No. Section 177.27, subd. 8 allows a civil action directly in district court, and \u00a7 181.171 does the same for most of the Payment of Wages Act. An agency filing is an alternative rather than a prerequisite. Which route pays the most? The court route is the only one that can shift your attorney fees to the employer, and it does so for claims covered by \u00a7 177.27, subd. 10 or \u00a7 181.171, subd. 3 rather than for every claim brought in court. For claims under sections 177.21 to 177.44 it also carries the equal additional amount as liquidated damages. A state agency order under \u00a7 177.27, subd. 7 can also include an equal additional amount. The federal agency route is narrower: under Field Assistance Bulletin 2025-3 the Wage and Hour Division supervises payment of unpaid minimum wages and overtime only, and does not supervise liquidated damages in administrative matters. The comparison depends on the claim. Can I file with the city and the state? Filing with one does not waive your substantive rights under the others, though the same wages cannot be recovered twice. They may not be able to run at the same time: Minneapolis Rule 3.10 is the wrinkle: the Department cannot investigate once it learns a civil action on the same facts is already pending, unless that action has been dismissed without prejudice. Sort out the interaction before the second filing goes in. What if I worked in Minneapolis and in a suburb? The city process reaches only the hours worked inside Minneapolis. The state routes reach all of them. Keeping your own record of which hours were worked where is what makes that allocation possible later. Will filing cost me anything? The city, state and federal agency routes are free. A district court action involves filing fees, and the fee arrangement with counsel is a matter to agree in writing at the outset. For claims covered by \u00a7 177.27, subd. 10 or \u00a7 181.171, subd. 3, reasonable costs and attorney fees are recoverable from the employer when a violation is found; contract claims and other causes of action do not automatically carry those provisions. This article explains Minnesota law, a Minneapolis ordinance and a federal agency process in general terms and is not legal advice. Which route fits a particular claim depends on its facts. For advice about your situation, speak with a licensed attorney."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/blog\/city-complaint-minnesota-dli-or-lawsuit-how-to-recover-unpaid-wages-in-minneapolis\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Reclamaci\u00f3n municipal, DLI de Minnesota o demanda judicial: c\u00f3mo reclamar los salarios impagados en Minneapolis"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/","name":"Ferraro Vega Employment Lawyers, Inc.","description":"Ferraro Vega San Diego Employment Lawyers","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"es"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/#organization","name":"Ferraro Vega Employment Lawyers, Inc.","url":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Ferraro-Vega-Employment-Lawyers-Logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Ferraro-Vega-Employment-Lawyers-Logo.png","width":300,"height":300,"caption":"Ferraro Vega Employment Lawyers, Inc."},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/ferrarovega\/","https:\/\/x.com\/ferrarovega","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/ferraro-vega-employment-lawyers"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/#\/schema\/person\/8683c49767db85170682d8c3e3b15ade","name":"Nicholas J. Ferraro","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"es","@id":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/pic-Nicholas-Ferraro-single-96x96.png","url":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/pic-Nicholas-Ferraro-single-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/pic-Nicholas-Ferraro-single-96x96.png","caption":"Nicholas J. Ferraro"},"description":"Nicholas J. Ferraro is a skilled labor and employment lawyer and the founder of Ferraro Vega Employment Lawyers, Inc. Based in San Diego, he focuses on representing employees in class action and collective litigation cases. Education: Mr. Ferraro attended the University of San Diego School of Law, where he was a member of the San Diego Law Review. Experience: Over a decade of legal practice, representing more than 100,000 employees. Court Admissions: Mr. Ferraro represents his clients throughout the State of California and the State of Washington. He is a member of the State Bar of California. Community Involvement: Active member of the California Employment Lawyers Association and the San Diego County Bar Association.","sameAs":["https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/about-our-firm\/attorneys\/nicholas-ferraro\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/ferraronicholas","https:\/\/apps.calbar.ca.gov\/attorney\/Licensee\/Detail\/306528","https:\/\/lawyers.justia.com\/lawyer\/nicholas-j-ferraro-1516289","https:\/\/www.avvo.com\/attorneys\/92108-ca-nicholas-ferraro-4750530.html","https:\/\/profiles.superlawyers.com\/california\/san-diego\/lawyer\/nicholas-j-ferraro\/fe87f689-79f8-46a5-978a-dfa6e277e589.html","https:\/\/t.lawlink.com\/profile\/53025\/nicholas-ferraro","https:\/\/www.zoominfo.com\/p\/Nicholas-Ferraro\/2016107549","https:\/\/lawyers.uslegal.com\/attorney\/nicholas-ferraro-22315066\/"],"url":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/es\/blog\/author\/nick-ferraro\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5418","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5418"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5418\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6291,"href":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5418\/revisions\/6291"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5356"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ferrarovega.com\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}